Back to Blog

How to Bypass HTTP/2 Fingerprint Blocks: Methods for Parsing and Arbitration

Modern websites block requests based on HTTP/2 fingerprinting. We explore bypass methods using curl-impersonate, Playwright, and anti-detect browsers with proper proxies.

📅January 4, 2026
```html

Modern anti-fraud systems have learned to detect automation not only by IP addresses and cookies but also by the unique fingerprint of HTTP/2 requests. Cloudflare, Akamai, DataDome, and other protective systems analyze the order of headers, stream priorities, and connection parameters — and block requests from standard libraries like requests, axios, or curl. In this article, we will explore how HTTP/2 fingerprinting works and how to bypass it for parsing marketplaces, automating social media, and traffic arbitrage.

What is HTTP/2 fingerprint and how does it work

HTTP/2 fingerprint is a unique set of characteristics that is formed when establishing a connection between a client and a server using the HTTP/2 protocol. Unlike HTTP/1.1, where requests are sent sequentially, HTTP/2 uses multiplexing, stream prioritization, and header compression via the HPACK algorithm. All these parameters create a unique "signature" of the client.

The main components of HTTP/2 fingerprint include:

  • SETTINGS frame — connection parameters (window size, maximum frame size, stream limits)
  • WINDOW_UPDATE values — values for updating the data transmission window
  • Priority frames — stream priorities and their dependencies
  • Header order — order of HTTP headers in pseudo-headers (:method, :path, :authority)
  • ALPN negotiation — protocol negotiation parameters at the TLS level
  • Connection preface — initial connection string

Each browser (Chrome, Firefox, Safari) and each library (Python requests, Node.js axios, Go net/http) sends these parameters in different orders and with different values. For example, Chrome 120 sends SETTINGS with parameters HEADER_TABLE_SIZE=65536, ENABLE_PUSH=0, MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS=1000, while the Python library httpx may send completely different values.

Example SETTINGS frame from Chrome 120:
SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE: 65536
SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH: 0
SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS: 1000
SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE: 6291456
SETTINGS_MAX_HEADER_LIST_SIZE: 262144

Example SETTINGS frame from Python httpx:
SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE: 4096
SETTINGS_ENABLE_PUSH: 1
SETTINGS_MAX_CONCURRENT_STREAMS: 100
SETTINGS_INITIAL_WINDOW_SIZE: 65535

Anti-fraud systems collect statistics on fingerprints from real users and compare them with incoming requests. If the fingerprint does not match any known browser — the request is blocked as suspicious.

Why websites block based on HTTP/2 fingerprint

Blocks based on HTTP/2 fingerprint have become widespread in 2022-2023, when anti-fraud systems realized that traditional protection methods (checking User-Agent, cookies, IP addresses) can be easily bypassed. Parsers learned to spoof headers, arbitrage specialists — to use proxies, and bots — to emulate user behavior. However, changing the HTTP/2 fingerprint is more difficult — it is formed at a low level of the network stack.

The main reasons for implementing HTTP/2 fingerprinting are:

  • Combatting scraping — marketplaces (Wildberries, Ozon, Amazon) lose millions on competitive price intelligence
  • Protecting advertising platforms — Facebook Ads, Google Ads block automation to prevent fraud
  • Preventing scalping — ticket sales and limited goods websites fight against bots
  • Protection against DDoS — HTTP/2 fingerprint helps distinguish legitimate traffic from botnets
  • Compliance with API licenses — some services want to enforce the use of paid APIs instead of scraping

Cloudflare, one of the largest protection providers, implemented HTTP/2 fingerprint checking in its Bot Management in 2023. According to their data, this reduced the number of successful scraping attacks by 67%. Akamai and DataDome use similar technologies.

Important: Even if you use the correct User-Agent and high-quality residential proxies, the request may be blocked due to a mismatch in HTTP/2 fingerprint. For example, if you send a request with a User-Agent from Chrome 120 but with a fingerprint from Python requests — the system will instantly detect this.

How anti-fraud systems detect fingerprints

Modern anti-fraud systems use multi-level checks of HTTP/2 connections. The process of determining the fingerprint occurs even before the server sends the HTML page — at the TCP and TLS connection establishment level.

Stages of fingerprint detection:

  1. TLS handshake analysis — checking the order of cipher suites, supported TLS extensions (ALPN, SNI, supported_versions), TLS version, and elliptic curve parameters. This is called JA3 fingerprint.
  2. HTTP/2 connection preface — checking the initial string "PRI * HTTP/2.0\r\n\r\nSM\r\n\r\n" and the first SETTINGS frame.
  3. SETTINGS frame validation — comparing parameters with a database of known browsers and libraries. If SETTINGS does not match the User-Agent — the request is blocked.
  4. Priority and dependency analysis — checking stream priorities. For example, Chrome creates a tree of stream dependencies in a certain way, while Firefox does it differently.
  5. Header order check — analyzing the order of pseudo-headers (:method, :authority, :scheme, :path) and regular headers (user-agent, accept, accept-encoding).
  6. WINDOW_UPDATE patterns — checking the values and frequency of sending WINDOW_UPDATE frames.

Cloudflare uses its own Akamai2 technology, which creates a "fingerprint of the fingerprint" — a hash of all parameters of the HTTP/2 connection. This hash is compared with a database of millions of known fingerprints. If there is no match and the fingerprint looks suspicious — additional checks are triggered through a JavaScript challenge or blocking.

Example of spoof detection:

You send a request with User-Agent "Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 Chrome/120.0.0.0", but use the Python library httpx. The system sees that the User-Agent indicates Chrome 120, but the SETTINGS frame contains parameters from httpx. Mismatch = blocking. The detection rate of such spoofing by Cloudflare reaches 99.2%.

Methods to bypass HTTP/2 fingerprinting

There are several approaches to bypassing blocks based on HTTP/2 fingerprint, each with its own advantages and limitations. The choice of method depends on the task: data parsing, social media automation, traffic arbitrage, or testing.

Method Difficulty Effectiveness Application
curl-impersonate Medium 95% API parsing, scraping
Playwright/Puppeteer with patches High 90% Automation with JS
Anti-detect browsers Low 98% Arbitrage, multi-accounting
Real browsers via Selenium Medium 85% Simple automation
HTTP/2 libraries with custom settings Very high 70-80% Specific tasks

Key principles for successful bypass:

  • Matching HTTP/2 fingerprint and User-Agent — if you emulate Chrome, the fingerprint must be from Chrome of the same version
  • Using quality proxies — even the correct fingerprint won't save you if the IP is already blacklisted
  • Rotating fingerprints — do not use the same fingerprint for thousands of requests
  • Emulating user behavior — delays between requests, realistic navigation patterns
  • Updating fingerprints — browsers update every 4-6 weeks, fingerprints need to be updated too

Using curl-impersonate for parsing

curl-impersonate is a modified version of curl that emulates the HTTP/2 fingerprint of popular browsers at a low level. The project was specifically developed to bypass anti-fraud systems and supports fingerprints from Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge of various versions.

Advantages of curl-impersonate for parsing:

  • Accurate emulation of HTTP/2 fingerprint — SETTINGS, Priority, WINDOW_UPDATE are identical to a real browser
  • Support for TLS fingerprint (JA3) — emulation not only of HTTP/2 but also of TLS handshake
  • Low resource consumption — unlike headless browsers, curl works quickly
  • Easy integration — can be used as a replacement for regular curl in scripts
  • Regular updates — fingerprints are updated for new browser versions

Installing curl-impersonate:

# Installation on Ubuntu/Debian
wget https://github.com/lwthiker/curl-impersonate/releases/download/v0.6.1/curl-impersonate-v0.6.1.x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
tar -xzf curl-impersonate-v0.6.1.x86_64-linux-gnu.tar.gz
sudo cp curl-impersonate-chrome /usr/local/bin/

# Checking the installation
curl-impersonate-chrome --version

Example usage with proxies:

# Emulating Chrome 120 with proxy
curl-impersonate-chrome120 \
  --proxy http://username:password@proxy.example.com:8080 \
  -H "Accept-Language: ru-RU,ru;q=0.9,en;q=0.8" \
  https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/0/search.aspx?search=laptop

# Emulating Firefox 120
curl-impersonate-ff120 \
  --proxy socks5://username:password@proxy.example.com:1080 \
  https://www.ozon.ru/api/composer-api.bx/page/json/v2?url=/category/laptops

For Python developers, there is a library curl_cffi, which provides a Python wrapper around curl-impersonate:

from curl_cffi import requests

# Installation: pip install curl_cffi

# Request emulating Chrome 120
response = requests.get(
    'https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/0/search.aspx?search=laptop',
    impersonate='chrome120',
    proxies={
        'http': 'http://username:password@proxy.example.com:8080',
        'https': 'http://username:password@proxy.example.com:8080'
    },
    headers={
        'Accept-Language': 'ru-RU,ru;q=0.9'
    }
)

print(response.status_code)
print(response.text[:500])

curl-impersonate is particularly effective for parsing marketplaces and websites with Cloudflare, as it emulates not only HTTP/2 but also TLS fingerprint. In tests on Wildberries and Ozon, the success rate of requests reaches 95% when using high-quality residential proxies.

Configuring Playwright and Puppeteer with the correct fingerprint

Playwright and Puppeteer are popular tools for browser automation, but by default, they are detected by anti-fraud systems due to the characteristic signs of headless mode and specific HTTP/2 fingerprint. Additional configuration is needed to bypass blocks.

Default issues with Playwright/Puppeteer:

  • Headless mode is detected through navigator.webdriver, absence of plugins, and specific window sizes
  • HTTP/2 fingerprint differs from regular Chrome due to the peculiarities of the DevTools Protocol
  • Absence of some Web APIs (WebGL, Canvas fingerprint may differ)
  • Synchronization of actions — bots perform actions too quickly and uniformly

Solution: using playwright-extra and puppeteer-extra with plugins

# Installation for Playwright
npm install playwright-extra puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth

# Or for Python
pip install playwright-stealth

Example of configuring Playwright to bypass fingerprinting (Node.js):

const { chromium } = require('playwright-extra');
const stealth = require('puppeteer-extra-plugin-stealth')();

(async () => {
  const browser = await chromium.launch({
    headless: false, // Or true with additional patches
    proxy: {
      server: 'http://proxy.example.com:8080',
      username: 'user',
      password: 'pass'
    },
    args: [
      '--disable-blink-features=AutomationControlled',
      '--disable-dev-shm-usage',
      '--no-sandbox',
      '--disable-setuid-sandbox',
      '--disable-web-security',
      '--disable-features=IsolateOrigins,site-per-process'
    ]
  });

  const context = await browser.newContext({
    viewport: { width: 1920, height: 1080 },
    userAgent: 'Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/120.0.0.0 Safari/537.36',
    locale: 'ru-RU',
    timezoneId: 'Europe/Moscow',
    geolocation: { latitude: 55.7558, longitude: 37.6173 },
    permissions: ['geolocation']
  });

  // Patches to bypass detection
  await context.addInitScript(() => {
    Object.defineProperty(navigator, 'webdriver', {
      get: () => undefined
    });
    
    // Emulating plugins
    Object.defineProperty(navigator, 'plugins', {
      get: () => [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
    });
    
    // Emulating languages
    Object.defineProperty(navigator, 'languages', {
      get: () => ['ru-RU', 'ru', 'en-US', 'en']
    });
  });

  const page = await context.newPage();
  
  // Navigating to the site with a delay
  await page.goto('https://www.wildberries.ru/', {
    waitUntil: 'networkidle'
  });
  
  // Emulating mouse movement
  await page.mouse.move(100, 100);
  await page.waitForTimeout(Math.random() * 2000 + 1000);
  
  await browser.close();
})();

For Python developers, there is a library playwright-stealth:

from playwright.sync_api import sync_playwright
from playwright_stealth import stealth_sync

with sync_playwright() as p:
    browser = p.chromium.launch(
        headless=False,
        proxy={
            "server": "http://proxy.example.com:8080",
            "username": "user",
            "password": "pass"
        }
    )
    
    context = browser.new_context(
        viewport={'width': 1920, 'height': 1080},
        user_agent='Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36',
        locale='ru-RU',
        timezone_id='Europe/Moscow'
    )
    
    page = context.new_page()
    stealth_sync(page)  # Applying stealth patches
    
    page.goto('https://www.wildberries.ru/')
    page.wait_for_timeout(3000)
    
    browser.close()

It is important to understand that even with these patches, Playwright/Puppeteer do not provide a 100% guarantee of bypassing advanced anti-fraud systems. Cloudflare Bot Management and DataDome can detect automation through behavior analysis (speed of actions, click patterns, mouse movements). For critical tasks, it is recommended to use anti-detect browsers.

Anti-detect browsers for bypassing fingerprinting

Anti-detect browsers are specialized solutions for multi-accounting and bypassing fingerprinting, used by arbitrage specialists, SMM experts, and e-commerce professionals. Unlike Playwright, they provide a ready-made UI and automatically spoof all fingerprint parameters, including HTTP/2.

Popular anti-detect browsers with HTTP/2 fingerprint support:

Browser HTTP/2 Spoofing Price Application
Dolphin Anty Yes, automatically From $89/month Facebook/TikTok arbitrage
AdsPower Yes, automatically From $9/month E-commerce, SMM
Multilogin Yes, advanced From €99/month Professional arbitrage
GoLogin Yes, basic From $24/month Beginner arbitrage
Octo Browser Yes, automatically From €29/month Social media multi-accounting

How anti-detect browsers spoof HTTP/2 fingerprint:

  • Modification of Chromium at the source level — changing HTTP/2 parameters in the browser code before compilation
  • Dynamic spoofing of SETTINGS — generating unique but realistic parameters for each profile
  • Synchronization with Canvas/WebGL fingerprint — all fingerprint parameters are consistent with each other
  • Databases of real fingerprints — using fingerprints from real devices and browsers
  • Automatic updates — fingerprints are updated when new browser versions are released

Configuring Dolphin Anty to bypass HTTP/2 fingerprinting:

  1. Create a new browser profile → select the operating system (Windows/macOS/Linux)
  2. In the "Fingerprint" section, choose "Real fingerprint" or "Generate new"
  3. Specify User-Agent — the browser will automatically select the corresponding HTTP/2 fingerprint
  4. In the proxy settings, add mobile proxies for working with Facebook/Instagram or residential proxies for other tasks
  5. Enable the "WebRTC substitution" option to spoof the real IP
  6. In the "Canvas" section, choose the "Noise" mode for a unique Canvas fingerprint
  7. Save the profile and launch — the browser will have a unique HTTP/2 fingerprint

Anti-detect browsers show the best results in bypassing fingerprinting — success rates reach 98% with proper configuration. They are particularly effective for working with Facebook Ads, TikTok Ads, Instagram, where fingerprint blocks are the most stringent.

Tip for arbitrage specialists:

When farming Facebook Ads accounts, use the combination: Dolphin Anty + mobile proxies + unique fingerprint for each account. Do not use the same fingerprint for multiple accounts — Facebook links accounts by fingerprint and can ban the entire chain (chain-ban). Change the fingerprint with each new profile creation.

The role of proxies in bypassing HTTP/2 blocks

A correct HTTP/2 fingerprint is only half the success. Even with a perfect fingerprint, the request will be blocked if the IP address is blacklisted or belongs to a known data center. Proxies play a critical role in bypassing fingerprinting.

Why proxies are important for bypassing HTTP/2 blocks:

  • Hiding the real IP — anti-fraud systems check not only the fingerprint but also the reputation of the IP
  • Geographic matching — if the fingerprint is from Windows with a Russian locale, but the IP is from the USA — this is suspicious
  • Rotating fingerprints — with different IPs, you can use different fingerprints without linking
  • Bypassing rate limiting — distributing requests across multiple IPs reduces the likelihood of blocking
  • Emulating mobile devices — mobile proxies provide real IPs from telecom operators

Which proxies to use for different tasks:

Task Proxy Type Why
Farming Facebook Ads Mobile proxies Facebook trusts mobile IPs from operators, low ban risk
Parsing Wildberries/Ozon Residential proxies Real IPs of home users, hard to distinguish from legitimate
Mass API parsing Data center proxies High speed, low price, suitable for APIs without strict protection
Multi-accounting Instagram Mobile or residential Instagram strictly blocks data centers, needs "clean" IPs
TikTok Ads Mobile proxies TikTok is focused on mobile devices, mobile IPs look natural

Important proxy parameters for working with HTTP/2 fingerprinting:

  • Support for HTTP/2 — ensure that the proxy server supports the HTTP/2 protocol
  • Sticky sessions — the ability to keep one IP for the duration of the session (for multi-accounting)
  • IP rotation — automatic IP change for parsing (every N requests or by time)
  • Geographic binding — the choice of country/city must match the fingerprint
  • IP cleanliness — checking the IP against blacklists (can be done via IPQualityScore)

The combination of the correct HTTP/2 fingerprint and quality proxies creates a synergistic effect — each element enhances the other. For example, when parsing Wildberries using curl-impersonate with residential proxies, the success rate of requests reaches 97%, while without proxies or with data center proxies — only 60-70%.

Practical cases: parsing, arbitrage, e-commerce

Let's consider real scenarios of applying HTTP/2 fingerprinting bypass in various business areas.

Case 1: Price parsing on Wildberries for competitor monitoring

Task: An e-commerce company sells electronics on Wildberries and wants to automatically track prices of 500 competitors twice a day.

Problem: Wildberries uses Cloudflare Bot Management with HTTP/2 fingerprint checking. Standard libraries (Python requests, Scrapy) get blocked after 3-5 requests.

Solution:

  1. Using curl-impersonate (curl_cffi for Python) with Chrome 120 emulation
  2. Connecting residential proxies with rotation every 10 requests
  3. Adding random delays of 2-5 seconds between requests
  4. Rotating User-Agent between Chrome 119, 120, 121 with corresponding fingerprints
import time
import random
from curl_cffi import requests

# List of products to parse
product_ids = [12345678, 87654321, ...]  # 500 SKUs

# Proxy settings (residential with rotation)
proxy = "http://username:password@residential.proxycove.com:8080"

# Chrome versions for rotation
chrome_versions = ['chrome119', 'chrome120', 'chrome121']

results = []

for product_id in product_ids:
    # Choosing a random version of Chrome
    impersonate = random.choice(chrome_versions)
    
    url = f'https://www.wildberries.ru/catalog/{product_id}/detail.aspx'
    
    try:
        response = requests.get(
            url,
            impersonate=impersonate,
            proxies={'http': proxy, 'https': proxy},
            headers={
                'Accept-Language': 'ru-RU,ru;q=0.9',
                'Accept': 'text/html,application/xhtml+xml'
            },
            timeout=15
        )
        
        if response.status_code == 200:
            # Parsing price from HTML
            price = parse_price(response.text)
            results.append({'id': product_id, 'price': price})
            print(f'✓ {product_id}: {price} rub.')
        else:
            print(f'✗ {product_id}: HTTP {response.status_code}')
    
    except Exception as e:
        print(f'✗ {product_id}: {str(e)}')
    
    # Random delay
    time.sleep(random.uniform(2, 5))

# Saving results
save_to_database(results)

Result: The success rate of parsing increased from 45% (without bypassing fingerprint) to 96%. Time savings — instead of manual monitoring for 8 hours a day, automatic parsing takes 30 minutes.

Case 2: Farming Facebook Ads accounts for arbitrage

Task: The arbitrage team runs ads on 30 Facebook Ads accounts simultaneously to test creatives.

Problem: Facebook detects linked accounts by HTTP/2 fingerprint and bans the entire chain (chain-ban). Using one browser for all accounts results in a 90% ban risk.

Solution:

  1. Using Dolphin Anty with the creation of 30 unique profiles
  2. For each profile — a unique HTTP/2 fingerprint, Canvas, WebGL, User-Agent
  3. Connecting mobile proxies (one IP per account, sticky session for 24 hours)
  4. Separating accounts by operating systems (10 Windows, 10 macOS, 10 Android emulation)
  5. Warming up accounts: 3 days of normal activity (scrolling feed, likes) before launching ads

Configuration in Dolphin Anty:

  • Profile 1: Windows 10, Chrome 120, mobile proxy Russia (Beeline), fingerprint from a real device
  • Profile 2: macOS Sonoma, Safari 17, mobile proxy Russia (MTS), unique fingerprint
  • Profile 3: Windows 11, Chrome 121, mobile proxy Ukraine (Kyivstar), fingerprint from a real device
  • And so on for all 30 profiles...

Result: In 3 months of operation, 2 out of 30 accounts were banned (6.6% compared to 90% without anti-detect). ROI increased by 340% due to the ability to test more chains simultaneously.

Case 3: Automating posting on Instagram for an SMM agency

Task: The SMM agency manages 50 client accounts on Instagram and wants to automate post publishing on a schedule.

Problem: Instagram blocks accounts upon detecting automation. Using one IP and the same fingerprint for all accounts leads to mass bans.

Solution:

  1. Using AdsPower with 50 profiles (one for each account)
  2. Residential proxies linked to the client's city (if the client is from Moscow — proxy Moscow)
  3. Unique HTTP/2 fingerprint for each profile
  4. Automation through the built-in scheduler in AdsPower (no code)
  5. Emulating manual actions: random delays, scrolling feed before posting

Automation setup:

  • Uploading content to AdsPower (photos, text, hashtags)
  • Setting the schedule: post every day at 12:00 client time
  • Adding randomness: ±30 minutes from the scheduled time
  • Before posting: opening Instagram → scrolling the feed for 2-3 minutes
```